Blog: Someone crashed into the back of my car, whose fault is it?
Tuesday 11th Oct 2011
“Someone crashed into the back of my car, whose fault is it?” - this is one of the most common questions asked after being involved in a car accident, but is ever the fault of the car in front?
It has become a rule of thumb that, in the event of a car accident, if someone crashes into the back of you it is their fault. If you are rear ended and your car is hit from behind the car accident is the fault (or liability) of the driver of the car that crashed into the back of you. If you have been injured you should seek medical attention as soon as possible.
Visit our Road Traffic Accident section to find out how we have helped people win compensation for whiplash or other injuries after they have been hit from behind by another car.
There have been cases where the car in front stopped abruptly causing the car behind to slam on the brakes and be crashed into the back of; but only when this has been on purpose, i.e. to cause a crash so they can make a claim, has the blame ever not been on the car behind. The truth is, if you have been crashed into the back of and been injured you should speak to a solicitor right away as you may be able to claim compensation for your road traffic accident. Contact us now on 0808 155 9070 to find out if you have a claim if you have been in an accident and injured after a car has crashed into the back of you.
Car Accident: Hit From Behind
The recent case of Steadman v London United Busways Ltd v Sala proves it is still incredibly rare for courts to blame the driver of the car in front when its been hit from behind. It was brought by a passenger who was seriously injured and made a bus accident claim. In 2010 6,268 people were injured due to an accident involving a bus or coach, and thousands of passengers suffer bus injuries and make a compensation claim after bus accidents. While straight forward, this claim has lessons for all drivers:
Valerie Steadman was a passenger on a bus travelling along Kensington High Street in West London. In front of the bus was a Ferrari sports car, driven by Mr Sala. When the driver of the bus braked abruptly it threw Mrs Steadman from her seat and she suffered serious injuries to her spinal cord, leaving here with tetraplegia.
Mrs Steadman made a claim against the bus company, London United Busways, claiming it was the fault of the bus driver that she had suffered her accident. The driver of the bus said that he had been forced to make an emergency stop because the car in front stopped abruptly and without warning, therefore to avoid a bus crash the bus driver had done the same. He claimed the Ferrari driver should have realised the bus was close behind and it wasn’t safe for him to brake the way that he did.
The court had to decide if the cause of the accident was the fault of the Ferrari or of the bus driver.
Hit From Behind: Who is at Fault?
Mrs Justice Smith had to consider a lot evidence from both parties, witnesses to the accident, experts and CCTV footage.
She came to the decision it was the bus driver’s fault Mrs Steadman had been injured because he’d slammed on his brakes. It wasn’t the fault of the driver in front because he had no obligation to keep the bus in his vision at all the times - the main focus of any driver has to be what is happening in front of them.
She had been unimpressed with the bus driver’s evidence and concluded that he had been impatient (he admitted he had already sounded his horn a number of times), and had failed to notice the Ferrari beginning to slow down. She also stated, after reviewing the evidence, that the Ferrari had been driving conservatively in order to conserve fuel, was alert to traffic around him and did not brake suddenly or without warning. Finally, she concluded that the bus was being driven too close to the car in front, not giving its driver enough time to react to what was happening in front of him.
There are lessons that can be learned from this case for all drivers.
Even if the Ferrari had braked without warning, the bus driver behind would probably still be partly to blame for the accident. While driving the obligation is always to be aware of what is happening in front of you - and this is the same for all drivers. A driver can’t be expected to give equal concern to the car behind as it does the road in front.
Can a Car Accident Ever be the Fault of the Car in Front?
There is a situation when the driver of a vehicle that crashes into the back of someone isn’t their fault. This is when it is caused by the driver in front on purpose, to make a fraudulent insurance and/or compensation claim, often for whiplash, after being crashed into the back of. The usual scenario is that an accomplice will drive in front of a vehicle that is being driven in front of a third vehicle. The first vehicle performs an emergency stop, as does the second vehicle, causing the third to rear end shunt the second vehicle. This concertina-effect leaves the first vehicle to drive away and the second to make a claim against the third. Only when it can be proved that the drivers of the first and second vehicle are in cahoots can all liability be absolved of the driver behind.
It is believed that such ‘arranged’ car accidents cost insurers £4 million a week, leading to the setting up of the Insurance Fraud Bureau to investigate all claims of insurance fraud.
At colemans-ctts our Motor department can help you if you have been involved in a road traffic accident that wasn’t your fault. If someone crashed into the back of your car or were rear ended into another car and suffered an injury you may be able to claim compensation. We have a wide range of experience on injury compensation claims after a car accident and can help you. Our personal injury lawyers can also help if you win compensation if you are a passenger who has been injured in a bus crash or other bus accident.














9 Comments
DJ
Monday 31st October 2011
What if driver in front first drives off at yield and then hesitates and stopped causing the driver in rear who relied on driver in front to proceed and had to look to side for oncoming traffic and not having a view of vehicle in front??
Colemans-ctts
Thursday 03rd November 2011
If driver A attempts to pull away from a junction and then hesitates causing driver B to hit driver A in the rear, it would still be the fault of driver B as s/he had not left enough of a gap/stopping distance. The Highway code at paragraph 126 discusses safe stopping distances.
Nick Olerenshaw
Tuesday 31st January 2012
What happens if car A pulls out of a side street onto a main road & Car B goes into the back of Car A.
Would this be car A’s fault for pulling out or would this be car B fault for travelling to fast as Car A managed to establish them self on the road.
alyson
Monday 23rd April 2012
what if car a pulls half way out of a junction and stops and car b goes into the back
Greg
Monday 30th April 2012
What happens if a motorcycle is stationary in traffic with bothe feet on the floor and a car drives into the back of them causing damage to the rear of the bike and injury
Colemans-ctts
Tuesday 01st May 2012
Hi Nick, thanks for your comment.
Whilst each case has to be looked at on it’s own merits and it is difficult to comment on a scenario without seeing all of the facts such as photographs of damage and written versions of events generally if the impact is to the rear it is more likely to be the fault of car B for failing to leave enough stopping distance. If the impact is more to the side of the vehicle it would more likely be vehicle A’s fault for pulling out of the side street when unsafe to do so.
Colemans-ctts
Tuesday 01st May 2012
Hi Alyson,
Generally in these circumstances the accident will be the fault of the party who drove into the rear of the vehicle for failing to leave enough stopping distance. The car in front cannot be responsible for the actions of the driver behind. if they have to slam on the brakes it’s the car behinds responsibility to be far enough away to be able to stop. See our other blog: http://www.colemans-ctts.co.uk/blog/is-it-ever-the-car-in-fronts-fault-for-a-crash-from-behind
Colemans-ctts
Tuesday 01st May 2012
Greg,
Again, each case has to be judged individually but in this scenario it would be usual for the driver who drove into the motorcycle to be considered at fault.
If the cyclist suffered injury they should seek medical attention as soon as possible and contact solicitors who specialise in motor and road traffic accident claims as they may be eligible for compensation.
betty
Saturday 12th May 2012
what about the situation when im trying to join a dual carragaige way and someone on the dual carragie ways slows down to let the driver in front of me out and i hit them as i dont expect them to be going so slow
Add Your Comment